farehilt.blogg.se - Tape face eliminated

#TAPE FACE ELIMINATED ARCHIVE#
#TAPE FACE ELIMINATED SOFTWARE#

They determined that using Amazon S3 for backups was easy to implement because it worked seamlessly with Oracle RMAN. DBAs had to evaluate whether Amazon S3 backups would be viable for their database backups. compared these figures with those observed from their tape infrastructure, and determined that Amazon S3 offered significant improvement. Amazon S3 is designed to provide 99.999999999% durability and 99.99% availability of objects over a given year. Amazon S3 Cloud based storage met both criteria. Backing up to on-premises disk based storage would have improved performance, but missed on cost competitiveness. required any new backup medium to provide improved performance while maintaining or reducing overall costs. The time and effort required for backup and for recovery operations proved to be a significant improvement over tape, with restoring from Amazon S3 running from two to twelve times faster than a similar restore from tape. At the same time, required faster backup and recovery performance. It was important that the overall costs of the backups did not increase.

Performance advantage and cost competitiveness.

That cost benefit analysis included the following elements: also executed a cost-benefit analysis to ensure that a migration to Amazon S3 would be financially worthwhile. As part of that evaluation, they considered security, availability, and performance aspects of Amazon S3 backups. This adds to the recovery time objective (RTO) and makes achieving it more challenging compared to backing up to Cloud storage.Ī initiated the evaluation of Amazon S3 for economic and performance improvements related to data backup. Contention for tape drives resulting from multiple users’ tape requests slows down restore processes even more.

However, if there is a hardware failure, human intervention is necessary to restore from tape.

#TAPE FACE ELIMINATED SOFTWARE#

When everything is working correctly, and there is minimal contention for tape resources, the tape robots and backup software can easily find the required data. When data needs to be durably stored on tape, multiple copies are required. Maintaining reliable backups and being fast and efficient when retrieving data requires a lot of time and effort with tape.The cost of this software was an ongoing budgeting pain point, but one that was difficult to address as long as backups needed to be written to tape devices. For, the cost of the software had been high, and added significantly to overall backup costs. Tape robots provide basic read/write capability, but in order to fully utilize them, you must invest in proprietary tape backup software. The cost of backup software required to support multiple tape devices sneaks up on you.And at the end of every fiscal year, projecting future capacity requirements required time consuming audits, forecasting, and budgeting.

#TAPE FACE ELIMINATED ARCHIVE#

During that time, managing tape infrastructure required highly skilled staff to spend time with setup, certification and engineering archive planning instead of on higher value projects. Significant capital expenditures were required over the years for tape hardware, data center space for this hardware, and enterprise licensing fees for tape software.

Utilization and capacity planning is complex, and time and capital expense budget are at a premium.

Some of the business challenges faced included: This has caused growing pains related to backing up legacy Oracle databases to tape and led to the consideration of alternate strategies including the use of Cloud services of Amazon Web Services (AWS), a subsidiary of. As grows larger, the sizes of their Oracle databases continue to grow, and so does the sheer number of databases they maintain.